Frank Morgan (The Shop Around the Corner) – Best Supporting Actor of 1940

Other Noteworthy Performances: Ralph Bellamy (His Girl Friday), Humphrey Bogart (They Drive By Night), Walter Brennan (The Westerner), John Carradine (The Grapes of Wrath), Ian Hunter (Strange Cargo), Paul Lukas (Night Train to Munich), Herbert Marshall (Foreign Correspondent), Thomas Mitchell (Angels over Broadway), Thomas Mitchell (The Long Voyage Home), Frank Morgan (The Mortal Storm), Jack Oakie (The Great Dictator), Sabu (The Thief of Baghdad), Akim Tamiroff (The Great McGinty), Conrad Veidt (The Thief of Baghdad), Raymond Walburn (Christmas in July)

Frank Morgan in "The Shop Around the Corner"

I was inclined to choose Frank Morgan’s performance in The Mortal Storm as the best supporting performance by an actor of 1940. I was impressed by his job in the dramatic role of a Jewish professor who endures persecuting under the Nazi regime in Germany. It shows off his true range, proving he was more than a comedic supporting actor as his resume might suggest. But what I initially missed is that his role in The Shop Around the Corner shows off the best of his dramatic and comedic abilities in the same film, making it a much more rounded and nuanced performance much more deserving of recognition.

Morgan plays Hugo Matuschek, the owner of a medium sized gift shop in (carefully established pre-war) Budapest. Just like any businessman, he is plagued by business problems: mediocre sales, escalating demands from employees, merchandising fiascos. His initial clashes with his chief salesperson, Alfred (James Stewart) are funny and endearing; there is a bond between the two deeper than most employee-employer relationships. It is more like a father-son relationship, replete with all the common ups and downs.

Like other classic comedic roles he’s played (like in The Good Fairy and The Wizard of Oz) Morgan is bumbling and indecisive. Here he uses his trademark mumbling and strategic yelping to great effect but without overdoing it, careful not to disrupt the deliberate tone of the film, which teeters precariously (though successfully) between comedy and tragedy. He is genuinely funny as he tries to assert his authority over employees who are largely more competent or thoughtful than he is, like when Alfred suggest he pass on investing in dozens of shoddily made music boxes. Rather than admit Alfred might be right, Hugo rashly agrees to buy the boxes and display them prominently in the store, as though he were just waiting for Alfred’s decision so he could do the opposite. (If, however, he hoped to prove his business proficiency he fails; the boxes spend the rest of the film untouched.)

It is in the later scenes we realize Matuschek’s moodiness is rooted in deeper personal problems, which he takes out mercilessly on Alfred. These scenes are uncomfortable for us to watch because Morgan has already established his character as an essentially good hearted man paternally bound to Alfred. Where is this hostility coming from? I won’t give away too much for those of you who haven’t seen the movie, but this story line gives Morgan the opportunity to show off his dramatic chops and he does not disappoint. Matuschek may have appeared to be a clownish bungler before, but we realize that those traits stem from deeper insecurities and darker conflicts within himself.

The closing scene, one of my favorite moments in movie history.

Morgan proves that he was one of the most versatile and talented supporting actors of the 1930s and 1940s with his diligently observed characterization of Hugo Matuschek. He proved that he wasn’t a one-trick pony, that he was able to dig deep and access darker emotions than some of his comedic work would suggest. He fluctuates between light comedy and dark drama seamlessly and bring to life a character that set the tone for the entire picture. My favorite scene in the entire film (maybe one of my favorites in all of film history) comes at the end on Christmas Eve. Hugo has bid farewell and merry Christmas to all his employees. He had a vague hope that someone would invite him to their Christmas Eve celebration, but they all walk off into the snowy night without doing so. Expecting to spend the holiday alone, he runs into the young stock boy Rudy and discovers that the boy, someone he never paid much attention to before, has no friends or family in the city. Hugo invites the boy to spend Christmas with him, joyfully and excitedly describing the menu as Rudy almost literally licks his lips. It’s a touching moment pulled off with skill by the great Frank Morgan.

Advertisements

6 Comments

Filed under 1940, Yearly Best Performances

6 responses to “Frank Morgan (The Shop Around the Corner) – Best Supporting Actor of 1940

  1. Hi Jason, absolutely agree with you that Frank Morgan is great in both ‘The Shop Around the Corner’ and ‘The Mortal Storm’, but that ‘The Shop Around the Corner’ is the best because it shows his full range as an actor. I’ve also just seen him in ‘The Good Fairy’, made five years earlier, and love him in that too – he totally steals the show from the leading man. (Though it is really Margaret Sullavan’s film.)

    Getting back to 1940, I also like Bogart in his supporting role in ‘They Drive By Night’, as I mentioned in another thread – the scene where he breaks down after someone makes a tactless comment about him losing his arm is very powerful, and I remembered it for years after seeing the film for the first time. He doesn’t really have enough screen time, but does a lot with what the studio allowed him.

    • I love Morgan in The Good Fairy. It’s a great comedic performance in a very good movie.

      I’m not sure how I forgot Bogart in They Drive by Night. You are right that he doesn’t have a lot of screen time, but he impresses in the few scenes he has. Thank you for reminding me about this omission. I will add him to the list of noteworthies.

  2. The irony of going with Frank Morgan (and ironically Jason, I will agree with you here in a very crowded field) is that till the end of time he will be most beloved for his performance in THE WIZARD OF OZ (and rightly so). Yeah, his range and acting in Lubitsch’s film represents a high point in his career, but he was larger than life as the bumbling Wizard, and part of the culture. But that’s hardly the point now, of course. You made the right choice and informed it with a stupendous essay. For me it was a horse race between Morgan and John Carradine.

    Best Supporting Actor: Frank Morgan (The Shop Around the Corner)

    Runners Up in no particular order:

    John Carradine (The Grapes of Wrath)
    Edmund Gwenn (Pride and Prejudice)
    George Sanders (Rebecca)
    Sabu (The Thief of Bagdad)
    Rex Ingram (The Thief of Bagdad)
    Frank Morgan (The Mortal Storm)
    Henry Daniell (The Great Dictator)
    Arthur Kennedy (City for Conquest)
    Stanley Ridges (Black Friday)
    Raymond Huntley (Night Train to Munich)
    William Gargan (They Knew What They Wanted)
    Walter Brennan (The Westerner)
    Walter Abel (Arise My Love)
    Jack Oakie (The Great Dictator)
    James Stephenson (The Letter)
    Akim Tamiroff (The Great McGintey)
    Stanley Ridges (Black Friday)
    Thomas Mitchell (Angels Over Broadway)
    Stepan Kayukov (My Universities)
    Ian Hunter (The Long Voyage Home)
    Ralph Bellamy (His Girl Friday)
    Frank Pettingell (Gaslight)
    Raymond Walburn (Christmas in July)
    Albert Basserman (Foreign Correspondent)

    • Well I suppose there is nothing terrible about being remembered for The Wizard of Oz, but this is a superior performance. Like Judy before, you have highlighted some oversights like Thomas Mitchell in Angels Over Broadway and Walter Brennan in The Westerner. How did I miss those? (And as for Stanley Ridges, I know Karloff got the top billing, but Ridges is really the lead. I have him in the lead actor category.)

      Thanks Sam for the kind words as always.

  3. Cristiane

    What a beautiful performance. This speech of his –

    Twenty-two years we’ve been married.
    Twenty-two years I was proud of my wife.
    Well, she…just didn’t want to grow old with me.

    Tears every time.

    • That’s a great scene you highlight. The first time I saw this movie (many years ago) I didn’t quite love it because I think I was expecting something lighter knowing that Lubitsch directed it. Instead there are some very serious and dark themes explored as well and that threw me off, including the Frank Morgan subplot. It took a couple more viewings to appreciate just how good the movie really is and how important Morgan is to pulling it off. Lubitsch needed an actor who could transition from comedy to drama with ease and he executed that demand expertly.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s