Best Supporting Actor of 1934 – Charles Laughton (The Barretts of Wimpole Street)

Other Noteworthy Performances: Boris Karloff (The Black Cat), Charles Vanel (Les Miserables), Michel Simon (L’Atalante), Henry Krauss (Les Miserables), Boris Karloff (The Lost Patrol), Sam Jaffe (The Scarlet Empress)

I chose Charles Laughton as the best actor for 1933 in The Private Life of Henry VIII and here in 1934 I am choosing him again for recognition, but as best supporting actor in the historical/ romantic (at least according to the publicity) picture The Barretts of Wimpole Street.  The movie lacks the passion or interest one might expect when watching the budding romance between Elizabeth Barrett and Robert Browning, two of the greatest poets of the English language.  One would think that they would speak to each other in more than platitudes and clichés.  It’s all mannered, stodgy, and it doesn’t help that two of my least favorite actors of the 1930s play Elizabeth and Robert: Norma Shearer and Fredric March.    The only time there is any sign of life in the picture is when Elizabeth’s tyrannical father Edward Moulton-Barrett creeps into a room and crushes any and all happiness and goodwill among the people in the room.

Charles Laughton plays Edward masterfully.  Later critics might look back at it and dismiss the performance as a dry run for a similar stickler for the rules character Captain Bligh in Mutiny on the Bounty, but Laughton makes Edward more than a villain doing everything in his power to chain Elizabeth to him (physically and emotionally) and destroy her budding romance with Robert.  He adds unexpected depth to a thinly written character that a lesser actor would have turned into tyrannical stereotype.  With a simple uncertain, questioning look we see that he is a man who craves the love of his daughter, but because of his unyielding principles he cannot be flexible.  He isn’t a monster: like most people who behave monstrously, he only commits monstrous acts.  He believes he is in the right, unaware that he is using his power to shackle his daughter to him and helping to extinguish her love for him.  His best moments come when he isn’t speaking and we can see him struggle inside.  If he relents he loses his daughter, the only one of seven other children that he really loves.  He is a man trapped by his own emotional shortcomings and uncompromising nature, faults he could never recognize, thus assuring himself a life of solitude as he forces Elizabeth to run off and marry Robert.  Laughton simply does a great job and the movie would have benefited from more time with him, rather than the two boring leads.

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under 1934, Yearly Best Performances

5 responses to “Best Supporting Actor of 1934 – Charles Laughton (The Barretts of Wimpole Street)

  1. Your scrutinizing work here is again remarkable. I once owned the laserdisc of THE BARRETS OF WIMPOLE STREET, and have since been hoping for a DVD release. Laughton was indeed superlative, as were your runners-ups. Karloff’s turn in THE BLACK CAT would have also been a great choice too. I might consider Charles Vanal and Henry Krass from LES MISERABLES and Peter Lorre from THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH as among the best from this year.

  2. Michel Simon in L’ATALANTE is another sure contender, methinks.

    • I’m not sure why I didn’t include Simon and Vanal. I had intended to include both, but for some reason they slipped my mind, so I am fixing that now. Krauss as the bishop is also a great choice. He has a couple of nice scenes. And I haven’t seen Peter Lorre in “The Man Who Knew Too Much” in a while, but that is a good call too.

  3. To be honest, I wasn’t aware there was a movie of Barretts of Wimpole Street with Charles Laughton. I’ve only seen the version with Jennifer Jones and John Gilgud. How did you go about finding this one?

    • I think I caught this on TCM. Unfortunately it isn’t on DVD and no one has been kind enough to upload it online. You should keep an eye on TCMs schedule to catch its next showing, though it looks like they just showed it a couple of days ago.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s