Toy Story 3 (Review)

For years I avoided animated movies like the plague.  I can’t explain why I had a block against them, but there was no part of me that had any interest in seeing feature length cartoons.  A couple years back I forced myself to start watching them again after some friends of mine had to practically strap me down and force me to watch Miyazaki’s Spirited Away.  Well of course I fell in love with it (thank you Lisa and Erik) and I began to think about all the wonderful animated movies I remembered from my youth like Snow White and the Seven Dwarves, Dumbo,and Pinocchio and decided to stop turning up my nose at all the current ones, especially those that people had been raving about. I’m glad I had this change of heart because if I hadn’t I wouldn’t have gone to see Toy Story 3.

I didn’t even see the first two until very recently.  I liked the first, really liked the second, but the third is the best of the batch.  This is one of those rare movie series that gets better as they go on.  Toy Story 3 is one of the year’s best movies.  It is emotionally satisfying without being empty-headed.  It has a tight plot, sympathetic characters, and a well-thought out point of view.

We revisit Andy’s bedroom, but now all the toys are locked away in a chest.  Andy is 17 and getting ready to leave home for college.  He has outgrown his toys.  In fact, many have already been donated or thrown away, most notably Bo Peep.  But the core group remains:  Woody, Buzz, Rex, Hamm, Jessie, Bullseye, the Potato Heads, and Slinky Dog.  They are preparing themselves for an uncertain future: either a life of limbo in the attic or disposal in the trash.  At the prompting of his mother Andy packs up his old toys in a garbage bag, but saves Woody and puts him in a box for things he will take to college.  He intends to store the others in the attic, but through a mix up they end up on the street with the garbage.  Woody saves them, but they don’t believe Andy didn’t mean for them to be thrown away and, against Woody’s objections stow away in a box of toys belonging to Andy’s sister headed for donation at a local daycare.  Woody tries to convince them not to go, but he gets shut up with all the others and, along with a depressed Barbie, they make their way to their new home for cast-off toys.

Woody vows to get back to Andy but the others are mesmerized by the daycare.  Barbie is won over by a Ken doll and the charismatic and fatherly leader of the daycare toys Lots-O’-Huggin’ Bear dazzles the rest with promises of a lifetime of love and play without being outgrown or being thrown away.  (If they are broken the other toys will pitch in and repair them.)  Woody wants none of it and escapes the building to get back to Andy.  Lotso assigns the other toys to the Caterpillar Room where they discover life with the littlest ones isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be; they are abused and drooled on.  When they want to leave the Caterpillar Room they discover that Lotso isn’t as benevolent as he first appeared.

Toy Story 3 is formulaic, but it uses the formula so well we don’t even care.  It reminds us why formulas became formulas and, if they are utilized thoughtfully, can still make fantastic movies.  What I love about this picture is screenwriters Michael Arndt, John Lasseter, Andrew Stanton, and Lee Unkrich have thought about what it would really be like for toys if they had consciousness.  They’ve thought about what their relationships would be with each other, with their owner, and his family.  This is true of the first two movies as well, but in the third installment they have carefully considered what becomes of toys once their owners outgrow them.  What would their fears about the future be?  What happens to forgotten toys?  This is a question they visited in the second film, but in this one they fully explore how forgotten toys might try to retain relevance and avoid the dreaded garbage bins.

I remember Everett and I having a disagreement after we saw Avatar.  I didn’t care for the movie because the story was recycled, the characters were cardboard cutouts, and the dialogue was silly.  I asked why, if a studio is going to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to make a movie, why they can’t be bothered to even try and write an intelligent script.  Everett told me they don’t have to and in the end I guess he’s right.  They didn’t have to.  People lined up and gobbled it up the way the studio hoped they would without much of a script.  But my point is why spend millions to make it look great and not have a story to match up with the visual effects?  How much more could it have cost?  (I’m sure James Cameron thought his script was A-OK, but, like Titanic, it really, truly wasn’t.)  Pixar has a great reputation of not privileging effects over story.  Even the Pixar movies I didn’t enjoy, like Wall-E, had a well-rounded(-ish) story.  Pixar and Disney could have slapped together a third Toy Story movie without much thought to the script and still had a success, but Toy Story 3 is a great example of how filmmakers (and I include live-action directors in this) should spend as much time on the script as they do on their CGI effects.  I believe Toy Story 3 (and the first two films as well) will survive the test of time, while Avatar will be looked back on as an expendable piece of nostalgia, like other past epics with bloated budgets and thin scripts (Elizabeth Taylor’s Cleopatra, King Vidor’s War and Peace, and those tiresome Biblical epics of Cecil B. DeMille come to mind).

This is meant to be the final film of the series and I hope it is.  The end of the movie is  incredibly moving that I was pushing back some tears.  (Wall Street Journal critic Joe Morgenstern wrote that the end “took his breath away”)  The wrap up is so satisfying that I want to imagine the future for Woody, Buzz and the others without that imagined future being interrupted by another narrative that might taint the progression of the series.  It’s a treat when anyone can make a movie that is well made and popular.  Normally the chasm between quality and popularity is wider than most filmmakers are able or willing to bridge, but director Lee Unkrich straddles the two successfully and has created a modern classic.  Whenever anyone complains to me about how corrupt or shallow Hollywood is I always disagree.  Yes, most of Hollywood is corrupt and shallow, but as long as something of intelligence and true feeling gets made, it can’t all be hopeless.  If Hollywood could make movies like The Wizard of Oz, Casablanca, Vertigo, and E.T. then the town hasn’t been a wasteland.  And if Toy Story 3 can be made today then there is still hope.

Grade: A



Filed under Uncategorized

5 responses to “Toy Story 3 (Review)

  1. satsumaart

    Wow, I didn’t know you liked the first two that much. I had no interest in seeing this one but maybe I will. So glad we were able to introduce you to Miyazaki. 🙂 Did you see Up or The Incredibles?

    • Yes thank you for making me watch Miyazaki. And to be honest I didn’t even see the first two until the past couple of weeks in anticipation of this one. I was surprised at how much I liked them as well. But this one is just plain wonderful. Everett and I were both holding back tears at the end. It’s just great. Do yourself a favor and go see it.

      I liked Up, but I haven’t seen The Incredibles yet. It is waiting for me on my DVR. I’ll get to it.

  2. satsumaart

    I’ll try to see it soon. Let me know how you like Incredibles. I love it. Especially Edna… you’ll see. ;b

  3. Everett

    With the latest and greatest trend of Hollywood being the 3-D craze I was a little nervous at what horrors could befall such a great franchise. 3-D in many ways has become code for “We don’t really have a script, good characters or any idea of whats going on (insert awful film here) BUT things are going to fly at you from off the screen for no good reason so give us $5 extra dollars please!” So yes, when this came around I thought “here we go again” but within the first seconds of this film that all went away. This really was a wonderful story. Scripted so well that you become emotionally invested in the feelings and well being of a slinky dog, Barbie doll and even a Piggy Bank. It’s rare that I find myself actually concerned and scared that harm might come to a character or in this case a cast of characters but in a few moments of this film I was terrified for what might happen next. It was as important to me that good things happen to these toys as it was for the toys. This is easily, in my opinion, one of Pixar’s best. An example of the power of filmmaking/story telling and how technology can enhance an experience without BEING all there is to experience. The ending to this film is so satisfying and wonderful it makes you feel like there is still good in the world and good in Hollywood. I fully agree with your critique and I’d actually gladly go see it again.

    • Yeah 3D always makes me nervous too. It’s often pretty silly. Roger Ebert has been very vocal about how juvenile 3D is. It is all these Hollywood execs pushing it who haven’t a creative bone in their bodies. But it works fine here, but there isn’t much need for it. It would have had the same effect in 2D. My friend’s husband once said he never didn’t like a movie because it was in 2D or never thought he would like a movie better if it was in 3D.

      And I would gladly see this one again as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s